THE BURDEN OF C. DIFF
RECURRENCE IS SIGNIFICANT

With approximately 170,000 episodes of recurrent C.diff (≥1 recurrences)
annually, there is a profound impact on patients, clinics,
and the healthcare system overall1

PATIENT BURDEN

Beyond symptoms, patients are concerned about recurrence and lost productivity

42% are very
worried about
getting sick again2*


26% miss work
even after C. diff;
63 days on average3†

PROVIDER BURDEN

With recurrence,
patients come back
again and again

25% recur after primary
C. diff, and up to 65% of those
patients will recur again4-6


Patients average >15
office visits in the year
after recurrence7‡

HEALTHCARE SYSTEM BURDEN

Recurrences lead to
readmissions and increased
healthcare costs

About 50% will have
a C. diff-related
hospital readmission


Managing C. diff recurrences
totals >$67,000 in healthcare
costs per patient per year9∥

* Telephone survey evaluated impact of recurrence on 119 patients with recurrent CDI (2 episodes within 15 to 46 days of each other and validated by medical record review).

An observational study of 350 patients with self-reported CDI diagnosis completed an online survey. Of 235 patients with ≥1 past episodes of CDI, 26% stopped working afterward as a result for a median of 63 days (2–3000 days).

Study to assess healthcare utilization based on records available for 95 patients with recurrent CDI from a single referral center in 2013.

§ In a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients, 196 of 413 patients were hospitalized within 6 weeks of completing their index C. diff antibacterial treatment or date of index hospitalization discharge, whichever occurred later.

|| A systematic literature review of 661 retrieved publications, 31 of which met all selection criteria, was conducted. Data were synthesized using a component-based cost approach to determine the per-patient, per-year RCDI-attributable direct medical costs.

ANTIBIOTICS CAN LEAVE PATIENTS
AT RISK OF C. DIFF RECURRENCE

Antibiotics do not restore the functionality of a disrupted
microbiome—a root cause of C. diff recurrence10-13

Broad-spectrum antibiotics

Beneficial bacteria

C. diff-specific antibiotics

Toxin-producing C. diff bacteria

C. diff spores

Broad spectrum antibiotics disrupt the microbiome, damaging beneficial bacteria, leading to C. diff colonization

Disruption of the microbiome13-15
Treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics can disrupt the gut microbiome, damaging the beneficial bacteria that defend against
C. diff infection and potential recurrence

C. DIFF COLONIZATION
Dormant C. diff spores can remain after the onset of a C. diff infection

Onset of C. diff Infection10,13,15
Although standard-of-care
C. diff-specific antibiotics kill toxin-producing bacteria, dormant C. diff spores can remain

CYCLE OF RECURRENCE
Increased risk of C. diff recurrence when a favorable environment is created, leading to a cycle of recurrence

Increased risk of C. diff recurrence15
A favorable environment is created for unaffected dormant C. diff spores to rapidly germinate and grow

Broad-spectrum antibiotics

Beneficial bacteria

C. diff-specific antibiotics

Toxin-producing C. diff bacteria

C. diff spores

HOW DO YOU KNOW WHEN A PATIENT MIGHT BE AT RISK FOR ANOTHER C. DIFF RECURRENCE?

Jean, hypothetical patient

Jean (63 years): A retired nurse who has suffered multiple recurrences

Hypothetical patient
  • Jean finished standard-of-care antibiotics for a recurrent C. diff infection 2 weeks ago
  • She is back—suffering agonizing cramps, severe nausea, diarrhea, and abdominal distension
  • Because she is retired on a fixed income, she has financial concerns
  • Jean has tested positive for C. diff infection (PCR)

Jean needs standard-of-care antibiotics to kill the active C. diff infection…

Risk

…but patients like Jean remain at risk of recurrence because her microbiome is disrupted

REFERENCES: 1. Desai K, Gupta SB, Dubberke ER, et al. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16(303):1-10. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1610-3. 2. Weaver FM, Trick WE, Evans CT, et al. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017;38:1351-1357. doi.org/10.1017/ice.2017.208 3. Lurienne L, Bandinelli P-A, Galvain T, et al. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020;4:14. doi:10.1186/s41687-020-0179-1. 4. Kelly CP. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:21-27. doi.org/10.1111/1469-0691.12046. 5. Cornely OA, Miller MA, Louie TJ, Crook DW, Gorbach SL. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55:S154-S161. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis462. 6. Nelson WW, Scott TA, Boules M, Teigland C, et al. J Man Care Spec Pharm. 2021:27:828-838. doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2021.20395. 7. Rodrigues R, Barber GE, Ananthakrishnan AN. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016;1-7. doi:10.1017/ice.2016.246. 8. Olsen MA, Yan Y, Reske KA, et al. Am J Infect Control. 2015;43(4):318-322. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2014.12.020. 9. Reveles KR, Yang M, Garcia-Horton V, et al. Adv Ther. 2023;40:3104-3134. doi:10.1007/s12325-023-02498-x. 10. McGovern BH, Ford CB, Henn MR, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(12):2132-2140. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa387. 11. Theriot CM, Young VB. Ann Rev Microbiol. 2015;69:445-461. doi:10.1146/annurev-micro-091014-104115. 12. Budi N, Safdar N, Rose WE. FEMS Microbes. 2020;1(1):1-8. doi:10.1093/femsmc/xtaa001. 13. Chilton CH, Pickering DS, Freeman J. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24(5):476-482. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2017.11.017. 14. Vincent C, Miller MA, Edens TJ, et al. Microbiome. 2016;4(12):1-11. doi:10.1186/s40168-016-0156-3. 15. Khanna S, Sims M, Louie TJ, et al. Antibiotics. 2022;11(9):1234. doi:10.3390/antibiotics11091234.

​ 
Nestle Healthscience Logo
Seres Therapeutics logo